PetertheWBUniversalAndParamountFan2002

PetertheWBUniversalAndParamountFan2002 is an American YouTube who is infamous for his rants and salutes. He is known to be a childhood destroyer who always rants on preschool shows.

{{#if:|[|}} PetertheWBUniversalAndParamountFan2002{{#if:|]|}}
{{#if:|}}
{{#if:Male | {{#if:Dumb YouTuber who Makes Stupid Rants | {{#if: | {{#if:Active | {{#if: | Gender: Male }} Type: Dumb YouTuber who Makes Stupid Rants }} Date Joined: Unknown }} Status: Active }} Subscribers: Unknown }}

Why All Baby Shows Should Hate Him

1. First of all, he just does a lot of generic Vyond-styled rants even though they were made in KineMaster.
2. Peter often overuses quotes from other Vyond-styled rants, such as "The animation is bad, the stories are lame, the music is boring, the songs are pieces of trash, the voice (actor)s are bad, etc.", "Characters like to go on failure adventures", and " Screw/Fuck/Forget [topic], and screw/fuck/forget [non-related topic], [topic that he likes that isn't related either] is [insert numbers here] times better than [first topic]" as well as using the overused "like and hate spots".
3. These videos tend to be very lazily made as they mainly show a picture on what Peter is ranting or saluting on while Peter uses text-to-speech for his voice instead of using his actual voice, which can give out uncanny effects, particularly when he's trying to make a laughing sound.
4. Whenever Peter makes a claim for any of the things he rants on, he doesn't explain why.
   • He often makes a lot of false rip-off claims without any proper explanation whatsoever, and would often consider something that ripped off another thing that don't have much in common, examples include:
     • In his PinkFong rant, he states that Hogi is a rip-off of Sonic the Hedgehog, even though neither of them have anything in common asides from being hedgehogs.
   • Whenever he rants on a channel that's aimed at a niche audience, he doesn't give out a proper explanation as to why he hates the channel, and just says that he hates them just because "their shows are made for babies".
5. Peter tends to make a lot of false claims and errors in his videos, all indicating that Peter did not do any research for them.
   • In his Kid vs. Kat rant, he says that Millie turns 10 in season 3, even though Kid vs. Kat only lasted for two seasons and there weren't really any signs of Millie turning 10 throughout the series' run.
     • He also claims that Kid vs. Kat rips-off The Simpsons without any explanation, even though neither shows have anything that much in common.
   • In his Tickle U rant, he says that Tiny Robots rips off Blue Sky's Robots and Wall-E, even though Tiny robots premiered before those two movies could even come out, so how can it be considered a rip-off?
   • In his Coronavirus rant, he said that Allen Daviau (one of the victims who was killed by Coronavirus) as one of the actors of E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, even though Daviau was actually the cinematographer for E.T.
6. Hypocrisy:
   • He ranted on country rants yet he still keeps his rant on North Korea to this day.
   • He claims to hate Christmas Yes Sunny Day No, even though his rants and behaviors are similar to that user.
   • He is also shown to claim that he respects opinions, even though he is shown to get mad at users like JayTheAustinDlionFan19 for his opinion on preschool shows, and Vince the Sesame Street Fan 2000 for his opinion on Bear in the Big Blue House.
7. The mock names he gives out to the things he rants on are really stupid, such as "The Problem Un-Solverz", "Shit the Troublemaker", "Shit McFuckins", "Literary Billkiko", etc.
   • For context for the latter aforementioned mock name, the "-kiko" suffix is a nonsensical suffix made by the Vyond and "logo kid" community used for things they don't like.
8. In most of his rants, Peter would say that "thank god he never watched [topic] and never will". So, if he never watched the topic he ranted on, then why did he do a rant on them and formed an opinion on them? This shows that Peter is doing his videos just for views (as well as going with what everyone thinks) rather than to share his actual opinions on the topic. Either that, or he's just trying to deny watching the topics in the first place.
   • Plus, in most of the shows he rants on, he's never watched it fully. He just hates it because it is aimed at a younger audience, other people say that the show is bad, and that he doesn't like how the show looks.
9. Whenever he rants on an episode of a series, he just summarizes the episode's plot rather than actually ranting on it, which can get boring real fast.
10. He often calls the actors, characters, or people who worked on a topic he ranted on "faggots", "gay", or "retards", which can be seen as offensive to any gay or disabled people.
11. Peter often doesn't make any sense while ranting on things.
    • In some of his rants, he says that he likes a specific character because they make grounded videos of the main characters, which doesn't make any sense, since some of the main characters don't get grounded. Plus, grounded videos are only things of Vyond or Plotagon videos, which are unofficial.
    • During the "like and hate spots" of his Little Bill rant, he says that Bubsy T. Bobcat likes Little Bill because "he thinks Little Bill's face does not look like it wanted to resurrect blackface" and that Bubsy "sucks for doing that", which ignoring the fact that he's fictional, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, since Bubsy wouldn't know what a blackface is, since he lives in a world of talking animals.
12. In one of his commentaries, after Jay Kizer said that it's channel forcing to wish a show to be cancelled, he played the "English Motherf**ker" scene from Pulp Fiction, which was a rather extreme reaction.
    • Speaking of Jay Kizer, he even called him a "retard" for his opinions on preschool shows, which once again, is not only offensive to disabled people, but is incredibly rude.
13. He even ranted on Primos, whereas he ranted on it when it didn't even come out yet.

Redeeming Qualities

1. His videos can have a "so bad, it's good" kind-of way, due to its constant false-claims.
2. Peter does sometimes have good points and are correct on what he rants on, such as with his Warner Bros. Discovery rant.

Comments

Comments (0)

Loading comments...